Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 20:09:55 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull.stephen.fw@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- References: <e57e2ffe-6ccc-4816-b7cf-fe05f682466d@app.fastmail.com> <m246zhlk7hpzvfj5s6iyygteni77pseerzlgk6yhjarnwlbdnq@jfh4mh4olq6o> <25852.4190.185171.497149@StephennoMacBook-Pro.local> <k33zyapdv4vna3zp3d4isvvi64xe256cagxyeafl2zuloz25o5@ioimlgx7rwcn>
lain. writes: > It depends on what it is. > If you're using software that's decades old, but doesn't make any > network connectivity at all, then you should be fine. I think Canna can be configured as a network server but the library I use defaults to either a pipe or unix domain sockets. > But if you're using something that does, then you better look for > alternatives. I don't see why, necessarily. Sure, I don't think I'd put NCSA httpd on the Internet these days. And I doubt I'd want to put a service whch accesses shared resources on the net that way. But much older software such as input methods that you might want to put on the network as SaaS are process-per-user single-purpose stuff. I'd be plenty comfortable configuring cannaserver as an sshd subsystem, for example.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- From: lain.
- References:
- [tlug] Input methods - again!
- From: David J Iannucci
- Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- From: lain.
- Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- From: lain.
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Why Wayland?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Input methods - again!
- Index(es):