Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:45:31 -0500
- From: Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- References: <20081221144507.GA89517@mail.scottro.net> <4fefd6340812210747u5d65088fs8dff32c86aac8435@mail.gmail.com> <20081221163919.GA90456@mail.scottro.net> <494F361F.6060004@bonivet.net> <20081222072238.GB5776@smtp.office.cynic.net> <877i5sy4ov.fsf@xemacs.org> <20081222100120.GA98316@mail.scottro.net> <20081223013633.GC29135@lucky.cynic.net> <20081223020608.GH5370@mail.scottro.net> <20081223024906.GC16829@smtp.office.cynic.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:49:07AM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote: > On 2008-12-22 21:06 -0500 (Mon), Scott Robbins wrote: > > > I got it from things like this: > > > Naw, no moderation bit for that one. However, I will keep the top > > posting complaints--I also try to mention trimming that is insufficient. > So you'll also try to mention trimming, but top-posting gets first > priority. The trouble with trimming is that save in obvious cases, it's a judgement call. Again, please feel free to email me personally when you feel someone hasn't trimmmed enough. > > > > Ah, this one was 4 lines. :) > > Extending your signature to ten lines total, not including the sig > separator. :-) Argh--got me there. Are we counting the separator? Not counting the separator, this one is within 7 lines--however, I'm not counting the space in there for readability. :) Curt, it's a valid point, but actually, long sigs have always struck me as the least problematic--the reason being that it's at the end and by that time, you can choose to read it or not, once your eye hits the name. It's a few more lines to delete, but with emacs or vi, that's hardly an issue. (I'm guessing about emacs--I figure it can probably do it easily if vi can do it easily.) So, if I understand you correctly, in an effort to sum this up, more or less.... You feel that trimming (and lack of it) is more of an issue than top posting. You would like me (and/or other mods) to pay as much attention to trimming as we do to top posting. You are not a Buffy fan. :) Or, you feel that as the show ended years ago, it's time to stop the quotes. Is that accurate? (I'm less concerned about Buffy than the other two.) The idea here, as I've often stated, is to make the list pleasant for all members--as we feel the list is a meritocracy, you are certainly one of the more valued members, whom we would like to please if that is possible. If I have correctly understood the gist of your emails, I believe it is possible. So, all Buffy jokes aside, have I summed up your major complaints accurately? Thanks. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: What should we do with the trio over here? Should we burn them? Willow: I brought marshmallows.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Gernot Hassenpflug
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Quoting...yet again
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links