Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:25:35 +0900
- From: Dave M G <martin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- References: <44CEC200.7050501@example.com> <20060801031124.GG17068@example.com> <877j1s6g9t.fsf@example.com> <44CF436C.1050306@example.com> <20060801142438.441a8340@example.com> <44CF55AB.7050409@example.com> <20060801155451.f4558e98.godwin.stewart@example.com> <44CF8DD8.8050009@example.com> <20060801193829.68331037@example.com> <20060801211200.70461021.godwin.stewart@example.com> <20060801224736.5950766a@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728)
Botond, Godwin, Thanks for continuing to help. Botond said:Downloading and building ubuntu's 2.6.17 might be a simpler approach for Dave: http://packages.ubuntu.com/edgy/devel/linux-source-2.6.17That's a whole kernel package for Ubuntu, not just the .config file, right? Just to be sure, in the instructions I followed previously*, where it said:sudo wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.17.7.tar.bz2 && sudo tar -xvjf linux-2.6.17.7.tar.bz2I would replace that with:sudo wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-source-2.6.17/linux-source-2.6.17_2.6.17-5.16.tar.gz && sudo tar -xvjf linux-source-2.6.17_2.6.17-5.16.tar.gzHmm... two things I notice here: this package is 2.6.17-5.16. That's a step back from the 2.6.17.7 I have now, right? Would that cause problems?Also, this kernel package is in the "edgy" repository for Ubuntu. If I enable that repository, can I just download and install it with apt-get? And if so, would that be a good way to go? I'm not sure if I download the repository version and it installs automagically how I'd tweak things like IVTV and whatnot.* http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=217657 -- Dave M G
- References:
- [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Mauro Sauco
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Botond Botyanszki
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Trying to clarify the idea of a "Bye-bye Windows"
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] [OT/long] Yet another JMdict front-end
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links