Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:05:00 +0900
- From: Dave M G <martin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- References: <44CEC200.7050501@example.com> <20060801031124.GG17068@example.com> <877j1s6g9t.fsf@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728)
Stephen, Josh, Thank you for your help. Stephen said:Note that the module is named "ip_tables", not "iptables" for some unfathomable reason.I can't find an entry for ip_tables, or iptables anywhere in make xconfig. I tried opening .config and doing a search there. But even still, I can't find them. Do they have some other kind of reference that I should be hunting for?Also, I'm thinking that I'm likely to come across a few more issues like this over the next couple of weeks. So I figured my plan would be to add the modules the same way I did with the IVTV modules as they come up. Then when it seems like I'm not finding any more modules I need to add, I'll rebuild the kernel with the .config file that should, by then, include all the modules that I'm needing.Is there anything obviously wrong with that plan? -- Dave M G
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Mauro Sauco
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Trying to clarify the idea of a "Bye-bye Windows"
- Next by Date: [tlug] Linux presentation PDF generation software?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links