Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:43:30 +0900
- From: Edward Middleton <edward.middleton@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- References: <4F84A345.1060200@yamame.org> <20120410233346.161641d9ecdfb2163cfc6664@kinali.ch> <4F84AF2A.7010900@yamame.org> <20120411093150.c7140ad0838b7d306d979231@kinali.ch> <4F86D121.4080509@free.fr> <20120413072232.c3c8700cc08940791b43baac@kinali.ch> <20120413034026.GA10455@fluxcoil.net> <4F87E8DE.8060208@free.fr>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20120203 Thunderbird/3.1.14
On 04/13/2012 05:50 PM, Francois Cartegnie wrote: > Le 13/04/2012 05:40, Christian Horn a écrit : >> We can do this in LVM layer with the new 'thin provisioning' implemen- >> tation which is in >=3.2 . With a decent enough LVM you get then when >> creating a volume group a /dev/vgroup/pool and logical volumes can take >> from the pool - and put back which is unused. > > Unfortunately, lvm is no match for btrfs, as it just manages the block > layer. btrfs does on-line resizing ; Any change in lvm implies shutting > off and resizing the filesystem. I don't know about shrinking but online expanding has been working with ext4 for a long time. >> Its there for quite some time, for enterprise distros since RHEL6.0 or 6.1 . >> Also working on LVM layer: you take a snapshot and perform your upgrade. >> You then either decide that the upgrade went well and throw the snapshot >> away, or you decide for the rollback and merge the snapshot back into the >> original volume. > > You'll have to change fstab & grub entries. > With btrfs you just designate the new 'default' root subvolume. No questioning brtfs has the potential to be better but no off-line recovery is a bit of a show stopper. Edward
- References:
- [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Francois Cartegnie
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- From: Francois Cartegnie
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Next by Date: [tlug] -tomorrow- nomikai April 20 ***NEW DATE***
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links