
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:16:53 -0700
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jonathan@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
A few weeks ago, I stumbled across this article:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
Now, that just seems wrong to me; it's not the Unix Way to be unable to
boot without /usr mounted.
However, looking at the list of distros that are either already using
systemd or have it in testing, and the fact that it has been proposed as
a dependency of Gnome 3.2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd
makes it appear that systemd is the way of the future. Ubuntu isn't on
that list, but if Debian has packages for it in Testing, chances are it
may be coming to an Ubuntu Near You down the road a piece.
As I prepare to upgrade my Envy 15 from Win 7 to Linux, what your
thoughts around partitioning? Should I hold my nose and make a / big
enough to contain /usr, or should I Do Things The Way I've Always Done
Them, which is this partitioning scheme:
/
/boot
swap
/tmp
/usr
/usr/local
/opt
/srv
/var
/var/spool (if it's a system that will be running an SMTP daemon; in
this case, not)
/home
Thanks,
Jonathan
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index