Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:39:06 +0200
- From: Attila Kinali <attila@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- References: <CA+kCxRb8xM4p9aHP+mux=J4QLuhiqDzxDpXv07+ScNce0SHumA@example.com> <fjhqpGgO.1318877142.0486440.bteam@example.com> <87lisjov50.fsf@example.com> <20111018113359.8ce8e093.attila@example.com> <878voippwj.fsf@example.com>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:14:52 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com> wrote: > Attila Kinali writes: > > > But why, why do these people think they can make a design that > > is good, fits everyones need, just in their spare time? > > I hate to break it to you, but the people developing Unity (including > their HCI group) are well-paid (at least, I know some people with the > same employer who have no complaints). Dunno about GNOME 3, but I > suspect those folks are professionals, too, quite possibly in all > senses of the word. They have two differences from the Big Two: I know that there are people who are paid to work on gnome/KDE. I haven't forgotten helixcode/ximian/novell yet, or that Sun spend quite some money on getting gnome to a usable state. But given the "design" of gnome (i dont know enough about KDE to judge it) i have the strong impression, that they are an uncoordinated bunch of people who pull into different directions, not knowing themselves where to pull. It really looks like it's just a part time/freetime thing to actually design a user interface or to think about what the user actually wants. > 1. They don't have as much money as Apple or Microsoft. Could be true. But then, quite a few companies are paying for gnome and KDE. > 2. But at least their problem is bigger! (Because unlike Apple or > MSFT, they're not in a position to force you to use their WM and > their SM and their dock etc etc.) This is not entirely true. KDE was build with one WM in mind. And, although you could switch, it was never supported. Gnome is going the way that they want you to stick with their WM as well. Gnome2 makes it pretty hard to switch already, Gnome3 has the policy that you should not switch at all (but it is still supposed to be possible... somehow) The only difference is that you can choose between gnome, KDE, Xfce, LXDE etc. But i dont consider this any different from choosing MacOS or Windows (at least in this regard). Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
- References:
- [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- From: Martin G
- Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links