Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:34:14 +0900
- From: Edward Middleton <emiddleton@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- References: <956ae5a90906030336lb7145c9nd52744bb1804c853@example.com> <5ffffd040906030402h1a07dcc7q44e43dddb7114e75@example.com> <956ae5a90906030419i7f18811at406ec86c62c94d8d@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323)
Doug McLean wrote: > This was my assumption as well. Ports, though time-consuming to > compile, seems to have one notable advantage in that you can install > the latest patches, for 0-day exploits and other problems. So I was a > bit surprised by OpenBSD's comments, and wanted to get a > second-opinion. :) > > On the other hand, I was thinking about this, and was concerned about > potential resource issues if the hosts are not that robust. I take it > that you guys have not had such issues, right? > I have no experience with any BSD's but I use Gentoo on most of my machines. I get around the resource issue on memory starved devices by compiling over NFS[1]. Edward http://lists.tlug.jp/ML/0901/msg00077.html
- References:
- [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Doug McLean
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Romeo Theriault
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Doug McLean
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] (OT) The enigma of Japan (was: UNIX jobs on TLUG)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] (OT) The enigma of Japan (was: UNIX jobs on TLUG)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Next by thread: [tlug] SSD filesystem
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links