Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Date: 03 Apr 2002 12:27:22 +0900
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <1017748014.2405.17.camel@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- References: <200204011154.g31BsJm16405@example.com><87vgbb4nnp.fsf@example.com><003201c1d9dd$e69be220$8e00a8c0@example.com><20020402094545.F2864@example.com><003a01c1d9e7$25c89660$8e00a8c0@example.com><20020402104625.H2864@example.com><004001c1d9ec$998516f0$8e00a8c0@example.com><20020402050311.GC838@example.com><008f01c1da14$f3289a10$0400a8c0@example.com><1017748014.2405.17.camel@example.com>
- Sender: steve@example.com
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Muller <acmuller@example.com> writes: Charles> I understand the position of the Free Software purists, Charles> and maybe if I came from that kind of background, I'd Charles> take [the] position [that you shouldn't have to pay for Charles> it, or something more or less like that]. Then you don't understand. The position of the free software purists is that you should have access to source if you have a copy of the executable. See http://www.linuxandmain.com/essay/sgordon.html for an essay by a guy who has successfully faced down rms even on the issue of charging for access to source. (Thanks to Simon C for bringing it to my attention.) I am, and I think most right-thinking hackers[1] are, all for projects like Mandrake accepting money from people like you who don't care if you ever see source (but I predict you will), in return for providing you with goodies that you demand but the hacker community doesn't emphasize---and the source, to boot. Like rms and (far more important in my scheme of things) Wiley C, I prefer to work in an environment containing only software produced by the community for its own purposes. (See http://tuxedo.org/~esr/, esp faq/smart-questions.html and writings/homesteading/ for interesting descriptions of what those purposes seem to be.) But I really do want to see the benefits that open source provides in terms of robustness and security extended to consumer-oriented software. And I'm realistic about the probability (ie, nearly nil) that hackers will provide consumer-oriented software on their own. Charles> As far as Xemacs is concerned, well, uh, feggedaboudit. Is that FUD I see spotting your collar and cuffs? Footnotes: [1] OK, there's the "don't hand chainsaws to toddlers" school of thought, but Windows---a sort of fractional-HP chainsaw---makes that moot IMHO, eh, Chris? -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Don't ask how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- From: Charles Muller
- References:
- [tlug] Provocation
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Provocation
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- [tlug] configuration
- From: Marlo Rocci
- Re: [tlug] configuration
- From: Matt Doughty
- Re: [tlug] configuration
- From: Marlo Rocci
- Re: [tlug] configuration
- From: Matt Doughty
- Re: [tlug] configuration
- From: Marlo Rocci
- Re: [tlug] configuration
- From: Matt Gushee
- [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- From: Scott McLennan
- Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- From: Charles Muller
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] And they said it was Free?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links