Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:51:12 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14684.11159.479803.641954@example.com>; from turnbull@example.com on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:09:43PM +0900
- References: <lists.tlug/20000601082443.A1809@example.com> <slrn8jcm1b.n3k.simon@example.com> <20000602121047.H252@example.com> <14647.28799.110218.783725@example.com> <20000630091159.A4704@example.com> <14684.580.232531.844923@example.com> <20000630114544.A4945@example.com> <14684.11159.479803.641954@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:09:43PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > how many sun4c users are out there and what are they doing with their > machines that requires tier 1 support? There are a _lot_ of sun4c machines out there. A neat thing about linux used to be that one could take hardware that would crawl under solaris and squeeze several more years of use from it. Now, it's a lucky thing to be able to get the kernel to run, let alone run well. > 2. the people supplying the money want things done their way Direct versus indirect control. It's one thing to be influencing the development of a standard, quite another to be influencing the amount of code rot in a code base. > I don't understand why aging Sparc hardware deserves higher priority than > it is getting. Huh? Oh. Looks like I'm less lucid than usual. The original rant had two major causes: * the knee-jerk desire to install linux on any machine slightly more advanced than a toaster, * the flat statement from the sparc linux maintainer that, because his employer has deemed the sun4c to be unworthy of support, he can't be bothered to QA code against regression for the sun4c. Should old hardware have higher priority? Should old hardware have any priority? Depends on one's point of view. Obviously, the focus of the sparc linux port development is to do whiz-bang things on new hardware. Personally? Although I have a fairly large stable of sparc boxen, not one of them runs linux. I grew tired of the constant regression in the kernel. Can't fight city hall. I hope that this message wasn't complete gibberish. I'll be quiet now, -- Chris ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: July 8 (Sat) 13:30 Place: LinuxProbe Hall Next Nomikai meeting: August 18 (Fri) 19:00 Place: TBD ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: simon@example.com (Simon Cozens)
- tlug: Late-model Linux
- From: Chris Sekiya <sekiya@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: message queue (IPC)
- Next by Date: tlug: System security
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links