Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- To: simon@example.com (Simon Cozens)
- Subject: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 17:29:51 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <slrn8jcm1b.n3k.simon@example.com>
- References: <lists.tlug/20000601082443.A1809@example.com><slrn8jcm1b.n3k.simon@example.com><20000602121047.H252@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Cozens <simon@example.com> writes: Simon> And he misses out the obvious conclusion: open source Simon> projects are not *magically* secure - someone still has to Simon> do the work. I don't see your point. He makes exactly this point in three or four places. Simon> With closed source projects, you don't even Simon> have the option. This is true. Open source is a GoodThang[tm]. But that's not the point; Viega is hardly likely to be attacking open source qua open source. The point is that people who don't understand the arguments that people like Eric Raymond (ESR) make makes them think that open source is a magic bullet. Not so surprising, since ESR himself evidently believes it to be a silver bullet at worst. I don't know if you had joined FSB (the Free Software Business mailing list) at that point yet, but about two weeks ago I had an exchange with Crispin to the effect that Linux distros will be forced to specialize, resulting in fewer resources being devoted to development. _I_ didn't have evidence, just theory, but looky! looky! Chris describes exactly the process I was talking about: >>>>> "wile y" == Chris Sekiya <sekiya@example.com> writes: wile y> Linux isn't as cool as it used to be. The quality of the wile y> kernel code has ceased to impress me, especially when wile y> compared to that of NetBSD. [...] wile y> Hell, support for non-intel platforms has seriously wile y> suffered in the 2.3.x tree (but this will the the subject wile y> of a separate rant, essentially indicting RedHat for wile y> determining the sparc hardware support priorities). Well, whaddayaknow. wile y> There _is_ a pattern. Indeed. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: July 8 (Sat) 13:30 Place: LinuxProbe Hall Next Nomikai meeting: August 18 (Fri) 19:00 Place: TBD ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Shimpei Yamashita <shimpei@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: simon@example.com (Simon Cozens)
- tlug: Late-model Linux
- From: Chris Sekiya <sekiya@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: archiving mail
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: META tags in perl scripts
- Prev by thread: tlug: Late-model Linux
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links