Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:45:44 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14684.580.232531.844923@example.com>; from turnbull@example.com on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:13:24AM +0900
- References: <lists.tlug/20000601082443.A1809@example.com> <slrn8jcm1b.n3k.simon@example.com> <20000602121047.H252@example.com> <14647.28799.110218.783725@example.com> <20000630091159.A4704@example.com> <14684.580.232531.844923@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
(I know better than to debate economics with Steve, especially when jetlagged ...) On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:13:24AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > And if you think that's the rebuttal, _you're_ missing the point. Nah, I was just commenting on the 'rebuttal' that I was expecting. > Salaries (value for value) are going to draw developer resources away from > some of their current activities. Sure, and that's a damned shame. Especially in this case. Like it or not, davem is the portmaster for the sparc port. When RedHat bought davem, RedHat bought the sparc port (although I'm sure that he'd dispute that; the direction that the sparc port has taken tells a different story). Is this good for Mister Miller? Sure. He's getting paid to hack on linux code. Is this good for RedHat? Absolutely. When they have a support issue, they can escalate to the guy who (in all likelihood) wrote the code. If he doesn't produce, he doesn't get paid. Is this good for linux users? Maybe. If the user in question has late-model sparc hardwrae. Otherwise, no -- because RH pays davem to work on tier one products ... support for the older sparc machines suffers thereby. > Fscking _IBM_ and _Sun_, BIG businesses, not to mention the usual list of > suspects like "Red Dog" Linux, "Tub-o'" Linux" and "Sousa" Linux, big > businesses themselves, are bankrolling the effort. Right, that's okay. I don't see very much similarity between the bankrolling of the i18n project and the bankrolling of the sparc linux port. > _you_ could spend a little more time on advocacy. Not everybody can see > what you see, you know. Until the masses realize that the coolness of linux is actually the coolness of UNIX, I fear that my words will be wasted. ... it's been a good week for cynicism ... -- Chris ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: July 8 (Sat) 13:30 Place: LinuxProbe Hall Next Nomikai meeting: August 18 (Fri) 19:00 Place: TBD ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: simon@example.com (Simon Cozens)
- tlug: Late-model Linux
- From: Chris Sekiya <sekiya@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: archiving mail
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: /var/log/messages
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: The Myth of Open Source Security
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links