Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:24:24 +0800
- From: Raymond Wan <rwan.kyoto@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- References: <501DE355.4090603@dcook.org> <EE43C9C5-E262-46CE-A89E-007470C30252@boxlightmedia.com> <20120805182902.1e653b178c042c230f331c01@kinali.ch> <878vdt8a03.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <501FB3B9.5000006@dcook.org> <87k3xbvps0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20120807112324.3313b1062128d112902ad0d8@kinali.ch>
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Attila Kinali <attila@example.com> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:28:15 +0900 > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com> wrote: >> So? It's still *much* easier to teach statistics using any of the >> major commercial packages than it is to use R, because they have more >> powerful, more usable GUIs. It may be that R serves statistics >> hackers as well as S-PLUS does, but that's only one of the jobs that >> S-PLUS does well. > > Interesting. Here at the university they teach psychology students > statistics using R. And i doubt it's because they cannot afford a license. I think it has a lot to do with when your department decided to use R. If it was not so long ago, then given the choice between R and S, I wouldn't be surprised if they picked R since the difference is perhaps not so big and it is less costly. But if it was a while ago, before R became popular, then maybe they would have gone for S instead and then was reluctant to switch. Ok, R vs S is not a good example since some the packages are compatible! But let's say Microsoft Office versus Open/Libreoffice... If I opened a university today :-) and had the choice, I'd probably go for OSS since Open/Libreoffice are "good enough". But, in most cases, a university would have switched over to Microsoft Office from Wordperfect 20 years ago (???) and there is a lot of reluctance to switch again (including all of those documents in the last 20 years). Yes, it is costly to stick with commercial software, but Microsoft knows this and uses site licenses and academic pricing to keep universities locked into a decision made 20 years ago. I'm not as knowledgeable as many of you in this area, but I guess it all depends on which software went to 'market' first -- the commercial one or the OSS one. Whichever comes second has to not only do as much as the first, but needs to give the user a good reason to switch. Ray PS: Yes, I know Open/Libreoffice can open Office documents, but it doesn't open it exactly. Something is always not quite right...
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Jamie Learmonth
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- From: Attila Kinali
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Next by Date: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links