
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 12:07:01 +0900
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] GPL vs. paid version and ethics
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
Nowadays commercial software and open source co-exist. In particular a
common model is for a GPL version and then a paid version with more
features. E.g.
http://www.infobright.org/Learn-More/ICE_IEE_Comparison/
In that particular case I was curious about "Multi-core query
execution". I wondered what would happen if I were to add that feature
(*) to the GPL version.
Legally I can do it.
If they host the source code, they could refuse to accept the patch, so
I'd have to branch, and then there are two versions going forward.
But I also wondered about the ethics. If I added that feature I cut into
their sales. Financing for the product goes down. Product quality goes
down. Well, in, one scenario.
Thoughts? Pointers to intelligent previous discussions on this topic?
Darren
*: An academic question; I am aware of how much work that could be, and
I have more interesting things to do.
--
Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer
http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work)
http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index