Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:09:26 +0900
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- References: <4E97A083.6030401@example.com> <BD9BE196-F8F1-455A-BE85-195E958A8978@example.com> <CAHU4tQTnj+o5i_XeW4kLd63yUBbcrcbNZyF96U1T4kvA3Hjs7g@example.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
>> There were a few articles at Ars Technica that offered quite an >> interesting perspective (and a few educated guesses) on the state >> of compilers in OSX. You may want to check this article (2009) and >> a few others: >> >> http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars/9 > > Last time I looked at it (been at least a year or so) clang was > still a mutant hybrid version of gcc. :-) I think that is LLVM, which uses GCC as the front-end. Clang is the replacement front-end to wean people off GCC completely: http://llvm.org/ Darren -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- From: brandelune
- Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- From: Kenneth Burling
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Apple vs. FSF and gcc 4.2.1
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links