Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 00:29:28 +0900
- From: "Lyle H Saxon" <llletters@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- References: <47502636.3060005@articlass.org> <20071130232418.442c6d66.gstewart@bonivet.net> <4750E74F.6070309@articlass.org> <20071201100520.3b889813.gstewart@bonivet.net> <ea4e853e0712020615g4acbd49yd32e7971f6b369a4@mail.gmail.com> <87ve7gy1zm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <ea4e853e0712030549w1e9c516eid014bd660b5f2208@mail.gmail.com> <87fxyjxynf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
On Dec 4, 2007 6:21 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote: > > Also, please define "HD-quality" - as there are so many factors > > involved! The picture resolution in one thing, and then there are > > optics, etc., and "HD" on what size display? > > I'm talking about processing it by computer; only the resolution. "Only" the resolution? Hee-hee! Remember that lenses have resolution too! That's where manufacturers cut costs for consumer-level equipment! Most people (thus most paying customers) shop by image sensor pixel count, zoom range and size of the machine. They don't understand optics and so that's what gets cut to compete with other camera manufacturers. In the chain from reality to viewing screen, any weak link destroys the quality. > > Regarding progress in photography - the electronics keep getting > > batter, but high quality optics are as expensive as ever. > > Granted, but that end of things is not on topic here. My point was > simply that you're not going to have to burn money on the computer and > software for much longer. Can you send me and some modern equipment back to 1991 to retake some of those tapes I have? No? Oh well. Anyway - yeah, well... things are getting better, but what is considered high quality is also getting higher, and quality video still has its costs! Cell phone cameras are garbage - frankly speaking. If you mention high definition video and cell phone cameras in the same breath to a professional, you'll be laughed out of the room! > And I would dispute your claim about high quality optics; looking > around, a lot more people can afford high quality optics than could do > so 25 years ago. "Looking around"?! Hee-hee! Specifics man! Where were you looking, what did you see, and let's hear prices for professional level optics for professional level video cameras. "More" people can buy them? Sure, that's probably true, but that doesn't mean they're cheap! High-definition high-quality video images from cell phones! Ha-Ha-Ha!!! You're a funny guy! Absolutely wicked humor! Still pictures from cell phones are not too horribly bad, but they're still basically garbage. But what do I know? You're always right, everyone else is always wrong, and you know everything in the universe and beyond. Sorry I read your message - I should have known better. Lyle
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] [non commercial] Linux jobsite
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Mencoder conversion of files
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links