Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:01:56 +0900
- From: "Thomas Kruemmer" <tkruemmer@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- References: <003d01c2eb7d$1565d5f0$0500a8c0@example.com><20030316104631.GA22035@example.com><002d01c2ec2c$865a82b0$0500a8c0@example.com><200303171944280851.001B2EC1@example.com><004801c2ed1b$5e2247c0$0201a8c0@example.com><200303182054150080.00482B3C@example.com><20030318152950.GC25158@example.com><20030318190333.GA6569@example.com><200303190809470446.00142072@example.com><20030319141154.GD14163@example.com>
On 19/03/2003 at 09:11 Josh Glover wrote: >Quoth Thomas Kruemmer (Wed 2003-03-19 08:09:47AM +0900): >Flame-baiting the Listmaster is generally consider Not A Good Thing... Neither did I flamebait you nor did I challenge your authority. >First of all, I do not consider cryptographic signatures to be superfluous. I beg to differ: on a mailing list they are. >Secondly, top-posting draws the ire of many on this list, and thus I step >in when there is a spate of it to remind the guilty parties that this mailing >list prefers, nay, demands that the response to an email be appended to the >bottom of the quoted comments. I am in full agreement, you are kicking-in open doors. >I think that top-posting encourages this kind of laziness. Again: I am in full agreement. >Therefore, I would advise you to take the comments that I make in my >officialvrole in the spirit in which they are intended, i.e. to maintain the quality >of this mailing list. Seconded. That is what I did. >In this matter, I think that your response was not only unnecessary, but >its >sarcastic content was downright childish This is opinionated and uncalled-for aggression. You are passing a judgement here. >In the future, please remember that I am not passing judgement on you or >anyone else, I am just doing my job. No one suggested that you were passing judgements, orginally. >-- >Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> > >Associate Systems Administrator >INCOGEN, Inc. >http://www.incogen.com/ > >GPG keyID 0x62386967 (7479 1A7A 46E6 041D 67AE 2546 A867 DBB1 6238 6967) >gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 62386967 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQE+eHqqqGfbsWI4aWcRAhLBAKChNE7A1cbIqYUw2M+zEYpnECdw0ACgtNi6 >9ujnf5W3dCuYuxr0yFvUNEU= >=0w/x >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 17 lines of signature. Not a statement, just a fact. Best Thomas
- Follow-Ups:
- [OFF TOPIC] [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- From: Mike Gauthier
- References:
- [tlug] Server Racks
- From: bofh
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: Tim Hurman
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: bofh
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: Thomas Kruemmer
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: bofh
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: Thomas Kruemmer
- Re: [tlug] Server Racks
- From: Josh Glover
- [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- From: Tobias Diedrich
- Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- From: Thomas Kruemmer
- Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] VPN appliance and network connection suggestions?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- Next by thread: [OFF TOPIC] [tlug] Re: Server Racks
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links