Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] i-mode i18n
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
- From: David Beutel <david_beutel2@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] i-mode i18n
Apparently TRON is opposed to Han unification, and considers Unicode an insensitive, imperialistic campaign by American industry. TRON wants to include rare kanji which only appear in some Japanese personal names and ancient literature. And, they argue that Unicode is not so easy to use either, with all its weird combined characters and such (a good point). For details, see: http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/characcodehist.html On the other hand, Unicode gives a rather obtuse response: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/han_cjk.html To me, the rare kanji seems like an unreasonable expectation, considering that Unicode already supports all the kanji from all the standard Japanese character encodings. Why not just leave the most commonly used 30 or 40 thousand kanji in Unicode and add the extremely rare ones to a higher plane of ISO-10646? Sadly the TRON multilingual character set was not covered in Ken Lunde's UJIP, so I have remained woefully ignorant of it, but then again he's an American too and probably in on that Unicode conspiracy. ^_- 11011011 --- Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com> wrote: > Jim Breen <jwb@example.com> wrote: > > > >> From: Tony Laszlo <laszlo@example.com> > > >> > > >> If TRON is good enough for kitchen > > >> appliances and satellites, why not the > > >> keitai? > > > > TRON! I'd prefer Shit_JIS to going with TRON's > anti-Unicode line. > > Quote: > > "Because native speakers of different languages > and/or bilingual people > can inhabit the same city, the BTRON machine must be > capable of handling > the character sets of all the languages of the > world. Moreover, > character handling on the BTRON machine must > faithfully reflect > character usage as it manifests itself in the > culture of a particular > people, no matter how large or cumbersome that > character set might be. > (Note: for this reason, Unicode is rejected for use > in the TRON > Architecture.)" (Source: > http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/btron.html) > > WTF? Am I missing an important syllogism behind > those lines? Do they > wait until Unicode manifests itself in the culture > of a particular > people? $deity, orthodoxy always scares the shift > out of me. :-) > > Ulrich Plate > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com
- References:
- Re: [tlug] i-mode i18n
- From: Ulrich Plate
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: MTRR (Was: [tlug] Notebook Question)
- Next by Date: [tlug] Memory Nearly Peaked
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] i-mode i18n
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] i-mode i18n
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links