[tlug] Re: Followup on mutt and gpg

[Tobias Diedrich <td@example.com>]

simon colston wrote:

> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> I am using Sylpheed 0.8.2.  Scott, since you applied the OE patch
> Sylpheed no longer recognises your mail as being digitally signed but
> puts crap like the above in the body.

It already is in the body, so it's not Sylpheed at fault :-)
I have the following procmail recipies to handle this stuff (out of the
mutt FAQ IIRC):

#
# PGP
#

:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
	:0 fBw
	* ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
	* ^-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
	|formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt"

	:0 fBw
	* ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
	* ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
	* ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
	|formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign"
}

-- 
Tobias								PGP: 0x9AC7E0BC
This mail is made of 100% recycled bits