Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg

[Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>]

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:00:11 +0900, Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> squashed
this out of the keyboard:

> OK, question:  If, as Josh notes, this is not an "issue" but just Mutt
> being compliant with RFC 3156 and the problem is OE's for not being
> so, is the end result of this patch then to make Mutt stop being
> compliant with RFC 3156?

Looks like it.

Found this while looking for further explanations:

http://www.bretschneidernet.de/tips/secmua.html

-- 
G. Stewart   --   gstewart@example.com
                  gstewart@example.com
Registered Linux user #284683

GnuPG key  : BA3D01C6 (pgp.mit.edu)
Fingerprint: C3DF C686 6572 6E59 E3E4  0F40 2B9A 2218 BA3D 01C6
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sign spotted in an office:
AFTER TEA BREAK STAFF SHOULD EMPTY THE TEAPOT
AND STAND UPSIDE DOWN ON THE DRAINING BOARD

Attachment: pgp00019.pgp
Description: PGP signature