Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg

[Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:22, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> As far as Sylpheed 0.8.2 is concerned it's an unsigned message with a load
> of crap in it.

And so is yours when I read it in KMail. Hm.  Except that most of the crap is 
confined to an attachment of unknown type. In direect comparison, all I can 
see are significantly different MIME headers:

Me (and Scott and Sajjad): 
Content-Type: text/plain; 
  charset="utf-8"

You (and Jonathan and most everybody else): 
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg="pgp-sha1";
  boundary="7=.0FCY4Md82:dwh"

or variations of this. WTF? Are we signing or not? KMail says I do, you 
don't, Sylpheed says you sign, I don't. Could somebody please shed some light 
on this?

Cheers
Ulrich Plate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9dHzDUOhlBc99YgYRArt1AJ9uAPKkVwVXc1BhC9lYpPq8og8BdgCdEHrX
ta0VZhwkCZ/I6xbsR20++Lo=
=INYO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----