Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:30:16 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- References: <200102260144.KAA06533@example.com><15001.62929.855278.759215@example.com><20010226173502.A2298@example.com> <15002.7751.918863.12528@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <oWueB.A.dTE.1Lwm6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > ATI Rage Mobility LM, 4MB. > The problem I'm seeing is that the framebuffer seems to be out of sync > with the built-in panel. You mean you can see most of the intended contents of the screen? See, Linux is better than Windows 2000 sometimes is, and Linux is far better than a Whistler beta. I can't tell you what I saw in a Whistler beta, so I'll just tell you what I didn't see: anything. Actually I did see some reasonable stuff until the setup program detected the ATI chip. -- Norman Diamond
- References:
- Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- From: jwb@example.com (Jim Breen)
- Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- Next by Date: *chuckle* Help wanted
- Prev by thread: Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- Next by thread: Re: Tiresome not-even-newbie question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links