Re: RedHat 6.1 and Japanese

[SL Baur <steve@example.com>]

Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com:

> SL Baur <steve@example.com> writes:
>> Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com:
>> 
>> > *laugh* It was hypothetical.  My reference to Canna was a reference
>> > to the Canna security patch that TL glommed onto ...
>> 
>> Canna isn't used by default in the TL distributions that make money so
>> your example doesn't make any sense.  Since the source code is so old
>> and decrepit it would be wiser to retire it the same way Red Hat did.

> In what way did RedHat retire Canna? 

It's not being distributed with Rawhide, and sources inside Red Hat
inform me that the code is too dangerous to distribute, so they
don't.  This concurs with what I've seen of the code.