Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?

[Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0800, steve smith wrote:

> Godwin Stewart wrote:

> > Also, FWIW, I feel that this discussion does not belong on the "lingo" list,
> > which is supposed to deal with natural languages spoken by human beings, not
> > with posting netiquette.



> >   
> Are you sure the people on tlug who were following this list are all on 
> lingo as well.  If not, I think that yanking the thread from one list to 
> another is rather impolite.  Also, lingo is "natural language 
> discussion" so IMO this thread also does not belong here.

>From what I understand, it started on tlug.  Not sure who moved it to
lingo.  

It seems that now it's running on both.  :)
Maybe the best thing to do is figure out who is most actively
involved--I haven't been following closely, but it seems to be Steve
(Smith & Turnbull), Curt, and Edward.  

Are all also on lingo?

It could cause another lengthy bikeshed [1] discussion, about which list
should be fortunate (?) enough to carry the discussion.


[1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING
-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6