Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:31:18 +0900
- From: Kenneth Burling <burlingk@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- References: <4AF70063.9060406@example.com> <874op36gjj.fsf@example.com> <20091110014327.GC19475@example.com> <4AF8C76D.9000300@example.com> <20091110032313.GE19475@example.com> <87tyx3dlbk.fsf@example.com> <20091110051706.GG19475@example.com> <87skcmevme.fsf@example.com> <4AF98D79.8090706@example.com> <4AF991C3.2040105@example.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Godwin Stewart <godwin.stewart@example.com> wrote: > > Only if one point is being answered (as it is in this particular e-mail) > does inline posting-equate to bottom-posting. > The impression that I got was that if you properly trimmed and the post was handled appropriately for that instance, you did not make either of his lists. :-) After all, if you just include a few lines of quoting and respond to those few lines, then the post is properly formatted.
- References:
- Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: steve smith
- Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Godwin Stewart
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by Date: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by thread: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links