Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:27:52 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- References: <eb6de36d0911081607l3e0d4887v6b3b9146d460b8db@example.com> <eb6de36d0911081609g28480f6co7cebc2ba08a4b520@example.com> <874op36gjj.fsf@example.com> <20091110014327.GC19475@example.com> <4AF8C76D.9000300@example.com> <20091110032313.GE19475@example.com> <87tyx3dlbk.fsf@example.com> <20091110051706.GG19475@example.com> <87skcmevme.fsf@example.com> <4AF98D79.8090706@example.com> <20091110190108.GX19475@example.com> <878wed4tum.fsf@example.com>
Stephen J. Turnbull writes: > You are assuming that threads are nanotubules My apologies for the cross-post. Death to reply-to munging!
- References:
- Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: steve smith
- Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by Date: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by thread: Re: [Lingo] [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |