Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- To: tlug@example.com, jq@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:02:39 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:01:14 +0900"<19990830100114.A31010@example.com>
- References: <19990830100114.A31010@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> wrote, > Manuel M. T. Chakravarty (chak@example.com) wrote: > > > Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> wrote, > > > > [...] > > > In fact, I will state as a reformed former user of Some Other > > > Operating System, that while still a bit rough around the edges, Gnome > > > is not as good as That Other Operating System's GUI - it's better. > > > > That's interesting. As I am using That Other Operating > > System only for the occasional game or to get at hardware > > details before replacing it with Our Favourite Operating > > System, I would be very interested to hear what you think > > are the features that make Gnome better. > [...] > In fact, having seen and occassionally used Win 98, > I find it's GUI doesn't measure up very well against Win 95. More flash, > but no more substance. That's what I thought. > The creators of Gnome and KDE, on the other hand, were starting with an > essentially clean slate. They could look at everything that had been done > before, take what they liked, leave what they didn't. While I would > agree that both still have some maturing to do, they are nevertheless > quite nice products which deliver their ease of use without restricting > those with the ability to do so from manually editing the configuration > if they feel like it. > > How do you think they stack up? I agree with you. But as I never tried to use That Other Operating System for serious work, I was just wondering whether maybe I missed some aspects. The last non-Unix OS and GUI that I used seriously was GEM on the Atari ST. I definitely agree with you that it is superimportant that it is possible to get around all GUI sugar coating and edit the config files manually. When you are knowing what you are doing, this is always the fastest way of doing things (and over a slow modem connection often the only way). Another aspect of Gnome's design that I like very much (although it is only partially usable so far) is that they have an eye on allowing to use scripting languages (Guile, Perl, Python, etc) to manipulate the Gnome components by a script (via Corba). This way, you can combine Gnome components in scripts similar to how you combine standard Unix command in scripts via pipes and stuff. Manuel ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: September 17 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: October 9 (Sat), 13:00 place: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Re: RELAY
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Redhat 6 and Japanese.
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- Next by thread: tlug: Redhat 6 and Japanese.
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links