Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:01:14 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- In-Reply-To: <19990828100349W.chak@example.com>; from Manuel M. T. Chakravarty on Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 10:03:49AM +0900
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908272348490.6067-100000@example.com> <19990828100349W.chak@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty (chak@example.com) wrote: > Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> wrote, > > [...] > > In fact, I will state as a reformed former user of Some Other > > Operating System, that while still a bit rough around the edges, Gnome > > is not as good as That Other Operating System's GUI - it's better. > > That's interesting. As I am using That Other Operating > System only for the occasional game or to get at hardware > details before replacing it with Our Favourite Operating > System, I would be very interested to hear what you think > are the features that make Gnome better. I think the Gnome Control Center is a better configuration editor than it's equivalents in the Windows Control Panel, and it has a better tool bar than the one in Windows 95. When Win 95 came out, it had a terrific GUI, the best around at that time. However, it hasn't really gained much in the years since. In fact, having seen and occassionally used Win 98, I find it's GUI doesn't measure up very well against Win 95. More flash, but no more substance. The creators of Gnome and KDE, on the other hand, were starting with an essentially clean slate. They could look at everything that had been done before, take what they liked, leave what they didn't. While I would agree that both still have some maturing to do, they are nevertheless quite nice products which deliver their ease of use without restricting those with the ability to do so from manually editing the configuration if they feel like it. How do you think they stack up? Jonathan Q Engineering Division Global Online Japan http://www.gol.com/ Tel: +81 3-5334-1700 Fax: +81 3-5334-1701 Direct: +81 3-5334-1756 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: September 17 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: October 9 (Sat), 13:00 place: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Re: RELAY
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Re: RELAY
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: the pros and cons of under-reconfiguring your kernel
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links