Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- From: "Hirotaka Yoshioka" <hyoshiok@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:10:43 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- References: <376591D6.9B335DFC@example.com> <37659B90.B4D40FB@example.com> <3765A1C3.CB0BC884@example.com> <14181.59112.966332.952650@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
"Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: > HY> I think the issues on Japanese patch are > HY> 1) The code itself is not so good. > > That doesn't stop non-Japanese patches from getting in ;-) > > HY> 2) The programer which made the patch is not experienced with > HY> the internationalization > > So somebody should educate them (preferably Uli, but he's busy, I'm sure). > > HY> 3) He/she does not care the importance of the merge into > HY> the baseline. He/she does not understand well the importance. > > This I don't understand. Isn't the importance obvious? Why don't > Japanese programmers care about merging? In fact they do; in the > Emacs context Japanese programmers are perhaps more upset about the > XEmacs/FSF split than others, and are quite active in producing > workarounds and emulations. But for some reason this does not extend > to fixing their own code to work correctly in situations they > personally don't care about, even when it would mean they could put > the maintenance burden on someone else. Emacs (MULE) is an example of the right person did the right thing. If it is obvious, we would see a lot of free software which have (integrate) Japanese patch. He/she does not know the importance, yet. > If Japanese programmers don't care about merging, that's tough for the > rest of us. But I would like to understand why not :-( I do care. I should talk them its importance. But it should take time. > Scott> So the Debian folks have a choice to make - go to glibc 2.1 > Scott> and possibly break Japanese, or stay with 2.0 longer and > Scott> lag a bit behind the rest of everyone. I think that TL is > Scott> experiencing a similar issue. > > Well, I hope they break the Japanese so that it will get fixed right. If you using a rpm distribution, rpm -e libwcsmbs makes you happy before you upgrade your system to glibc 2.1 > Anyway, Ulrich was promising a correct fix for the wctombs stuff at > end of March, maybe it will happen for 2.2 ;-) I'd like to help. Regards, Hiro -- Hiro Yoshioka/Principal Engineer mailto:hyoshiok@example.com (office) mailto:yoshioka@example.com (home) http://www.best.com/~yoshioka/d/98/ The statements, views and opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: June 19 (Sat), 18:30 place: Temple Univ. *** Topics: 1. Linux SMP on a quad-Xeon server 2. The Green Frog Linux distribution Next Nomikai: July 16 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- From: Scott Stone <ss8913@example.com>
- Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- From: "Hirotaka Yoshioka" <hyoshiok@example.com>
- Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- From: Scott Stone <ss8913@example.com>
- Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- Next by Date: tlug: Junk to give away
- Prev by thread: Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: tlug: vine]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links