Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 07:11:16 -0400
- From: Scott Robbins <srobb@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- References: <c6302f9114066b641e601c4ff22b2387@posteo.de> <7545dad0-b80a-4f59-ba57-4e09cba266e4@l.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <26573.16652.506798.590886@StephennoMacBook-Pro.local>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:19:46AM +0000, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Charles Muller writes: > > > It seems like in doing so, it is advisable to update the OS. Both > > CentOS 7 and 8 are already E0L, so we're thinking about doing a > > clean install of CentOS 9 (although we're open to other > > distributions). Does anyone have any advice regarding this move? > > I agree with Brian, recent and future CentOS is not Grampaw's CentOS > any more. AIUI it has been integrated into Red Hat's dev process, and > now is more of a "pre-branding" release candidate for RHEL than an > RHEL with the serial numbers filed off. > If I haven't commented already, I'd add my voice to this. CentOS is now CentOS Stream, more or less a development platform for RH. Current stream is similar to RH's 10 Beta right now. (Fedora is also more or less a development platform, but more desktop oriented.) > I have nothing against Rocky Linux, and there is at least one active > contributor in TLUG so community support for you personally and your > organization through you may be better than alternatives (in the > unlikely event that you need OS-level support for any of the RHEL > alternatives). But I will mention that my employer recommends and > offers commercial support for Alma Linux, and I can testify that > they're well-documented. So it's a quality product too. I've used both, and at this point, at least, find little to differentiate between them, but I've not looked too deeply into it. Alma also has Alma Kitten, which seems to be similar to CentOS Stream. As far as I've seen, so far, there's little to choose between them, they're both well supported. I *vaguely* remember that Alma is now going to be API compatible with RH, vs bit for bit, while I *think* Rocky is still trying for bit to bit. A couple of asides, which may interest a few members. On an AMD machine running FreeBSD, FreeBSD's Bhyve, its virtualization variant, won't install RH/Alma/Rocky/ 9.5, apparently due to a bug in glibc. You can install Alma 9.4 and upgrade without problems. It is also working with CentOS stream and Alma Kitten, though not with RHEL10-Beta. Also as RHEL10 is only using Wayland, the only available desktop at present, (though it is Beta at the moment) is Gnome. However, one can install labwc (a Wayland variant, very like openbox) and the alcritty terminal, using the install instructions from their respective github sites. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- From: Brian Clemens
- References:
- [tlug] [Back In Time] Update Japanese translations targeting upcoming Debian 13 Trixie
- From: c . buhtz
- [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- From: Charles Muller
- [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Upgrading from CentOS 7
- Index(es):