Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 08:10:09 +0100
- From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- References: <20210111114148.GB27512@fluxcoil.net> <5a801c9c-3f94-34ba-5ea3-62d22c97ab4e@fgs.eti.br> <20210111134308.GB25280@fluxcoil.net> <20210111135429.GA26056@fluxcoil.net> <50b7421c-abb9-28e5-ab48-4b9701ec13fd@fgs.eti.br>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Hoi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 02:35:33PM +0000, Schwartz, Fernando G. | @SCA wrote: > > ... The machine " FQDN " must be " fluxcoil.net ". That's what the website > test error refers to. > BTW, for [f]ully [q]ualified [d]omain [n]ame of the host machine, I'd > recommend: > < some name for the machine > + < domain name >. Therefore, not just " > fluxcoil.net " but rather, let's say, " mail.fluxcoil.net ". You are right, one detail about the mail config was not in order, but I fixed it and talked with t-online, that is not the issue. They 'demand' full address and name on my webpage to accept mails from me. More verbose on what was misconfigured: As of yesterday, I had this: - MX record for fluxcoil.net was pointing at mail.fluxcoil.net - mail.fluxcoil.net had an A record to my server - the postfix was acting as 'fluxcoil.net' - and the IP reverse lookup was pointing at fluxcoil.net So while it had not presented issues so far, these were not aligned. Now: - MX record was not changed, also not mail.fluxcoil.net A record - postfix is now acting as 'mail.fluxcoil.net' - the IP reverse lookup is now pointing at mail.fluxcoil.net This is not convenient as all reverse lookups for the IP will now bring up mail.fluxcoil.net, even if these were related to other services, i.e. https. That issue was what caused the warning on https://mxtoolbox.com/diagnostic.aspx . So it's basically back to my original issue: a provider has setup rules asking me to publish my data, only then he will accept mails from me. Chris
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Raymond Wan
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Schwartz, Fernando G. | @SCA
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- From: Schwartz, Fernando G. | @SCA
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [slightly OT] SMTP and the internet, protocols and the internet
- Index(es):