Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:54:49 +0900
- From: Shawn Brown <big.coffee.lover@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- References: <AANLkTin0q7HWMpW2t2vQu0MWsDOwbyqzZUTe=5au-xrf@example.com> <87k4mkxmvs.fsf@example.com> <AANLkTikV5dJBR4tHSsUgOO-iwWk_5e6wt1U-C81a3ZPU@example.com> <E42B95A3-9B21-4E4D-A20B-E58A5B5A2172@example.com>
> Without the tool chain, it makes no sense to make the code open. After all, no one will be able to build / modify / hack the code. It's a gcc arm toolchain, and the build script is of course available. >If you guys don't see the point of having a free software distribution like Debian, why not use a different distribution ? We support linux, windows and osx. They all use the same binary firmware that gets loaded onto another device. >I'm certainly not going to be hacking USB device firmware any time soon, but there's almost certainly somebody around who does want to. The source is available and the toolchain is available. My question is why does everyone have to build the firmware just because some people *may* want to. In reality it makes maintenance of a small project more difficult.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Jawaad Mahmood
- References:
- [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Shawn Brown
- [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Shawn Brown
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Jawaad Mahmood
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links