Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:19:36 +0900
- From: Shawn Brown <big.coffee.lover@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- References: <AANLkTin0q7HWMpW2t2vQu0MWsDOwbyqzZUTe=5au-xrf@example.com> <87k4mkxmvs.fsf@example.com>
> > It seems weird to me that to make a Debian package that will load a > > binary onto another device, that the src files and tool chain > > needed to make that binary be included in the Debian package. > > It's entirely unclear what you're talking about. Is it possible that > this is just the GPL requirement to include the preferred version of > the source for modifying the software in any distribution? If it is, > it's not a question of "Debian ideology", it's the law. No that's not the issue. We include the source for everything and the toolchain itself is gpl. What we want to do is include a binary that will be flashed to a third device. Debian maintainers are saying that to make a package which will flash the binary to another device, that we should include the tool chain to make the binary in the Debian package, and create it as part of the Debian install. After it's flashed, the package will enable the user to communicate write programs for the device. Yeah, when I think about it, I don't understand it either. Shawn
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Sach Jobb
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Jawaad Mahmood
- Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Shawn Brown
- [tlug] Debian rant
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Debian rant
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Debian rant
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Debian rant
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links