Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:32:53 +0200
- From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- References: <956ae5a90906030336lb7145c9nd52744bb1804c853@example.com> <20090603105647.GA18091@example.com> <d8fcc0800906030649g688a580j203235f71c407c53@example.com> <20090603140121.GA18399@example.com> <d8fcc0800906030715s79e6bc66l2b8927232e0b70e8@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:15:51PM +0100, Josh Glover wrote: > 2009/6/3 Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>: > > > On NetBSD the recommendation is futile since pkgsrc is the default ;) > > NetBSD also has binary packages, IIRC. Yes, besides that pkgsrc is used, no further ports-system. Christian
- References:
- [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Doug McLean
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Josh Glover
- [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] (OT) The enigma of Japan (was: UNIX jobs on TLUG)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] (OT) The enigma of Japan (was: UNIX jobs on TLUG)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |