Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:01:21 +0200
 - From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
 - Subject: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 - References: <956ae5a90906030336lb7145c9nd52744bb1804c853@example.com> <20090603105647.GA18091@example.com> <d8fcc0800906030649g688a580j203235f71c407c53@example.com>
 - User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
 
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Josh Glover wrote: > 2009/6/3 Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>: > > > On OpenBSD also pkgsrc should be investigated. > > Or NetBSD, for that matter. I'd actually be using NetBSD today if it > wasn't for the power of Portage making it too frustrating to use any > other from-source package system. On NetBSD the recommendation is futile since pkgsrc is the default ;) Its just remarkable the native OpenBSD ports apparently have a hard stand against the non-native pkgsrc. Last box is used OpenBSD on was a 400mhz Sun Netra, NetBSD failing to boot that one for me was the cause for installing OpenBSD. Christian
- Follow-Ups:
 
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 
- From: Josh Glover
 
- References:
 
- [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 
- From: Doug McLean
 - Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 
- From: Christian Horn
 - Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 
- From: Josh Glover
 Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 - Next by Date: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 - Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 - Next by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
 - Index(es):
 
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links