Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:13:01 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- References: <46B6E363.1010101@cnt.mxt.nes.nec.co.jp> <d8fcc0800708060212j1d0f16e7ybcdea487ff004ba6@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0708062157030.11029@homeric.cynic.net> <d8fcc0800708061634w34b11790s8898274ee67fe535@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0708080914040.22040@homeric.cynic.net> <87y7gm7dbo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0708090315210.2520@homeric.cynic.net> <87hcn970qz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
[Stuff about chords.]
The same thing is true of uppercase and other shifted keystrokes, of course. Do you have a keyboard layout that makes the most commonly used uppercase letters available as single keystrokes? If not, would you consider using it now that I mention it?
No, and no. But I certainly consider an uppercase letter to be two keystrokes. Typing "list this" for me is faster and much more comfortable than typing "LIST THIS"
Maybe that's unfair. I don't think the repeated control characters should count Control as keystrokes twice.
I'll buy that.
So accepting your accounting, Emacs costs about 50% more than vi.
Well, it's going to vary enormously, but yeah, I'd say that in general, movement-related commands (and actions based on movement-related commands) are something like that much more expensive in Emacs.
As a data point, is this kind of operation often in your inner loop?
Something that is alltogether that complex is not all that frequent, but broken down into smaller operations, yeah, I use stuff like this fairly often.
In general, you should *not* use position-based navigation in Emacs. It's much more efficient to use content-based navigation and mark-based navigation to get "close" to where you want to be.
Ah. I guess that's something that a lot of Emacs users don't know, which is possibly why they look very inefficent to me (and are very inefficient).
Granted, most people, even those who generally are pretty efficient users, never make paragraphs and sexps part of their daily repertoire....
Wow. I use both extremely heavily, for both motion and modification.
then M-x forward-paragraph RET will do what you want, and will also inform you that it's bound to "M-}, M-down, M-kp-down".
That's very cool, and a fairly typical example of how Emacs' programmability is much better than vi's.
Oh, wait...what happened to our editor war?
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts [C&C?]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts [C&C?]
- From: Curt Sampson
- [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Email encoding for DoCoMo and AU (was: font/char set question)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] How to use FF's shortcuts [C&C?]
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Efficient editor keystrokes [was: How to use FF's shortcuts]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links