Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:37:13 +0900
- From: "Keith Bawden" <keith@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- References: <F116CBF5-C65E-4DC7-A413-F78075405F62@miyazaki-mic.ac.jp> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0705221330400.24924@homeric.cynic.net> <46527F49.6060000@samsara.bebear.net>
>> ...and though it depends on the use of the system, it would be great >> if there were some kind of general formula for deciding the best >> partition scheme. > > There isn't. It depends completely on the use of the system. Generally, > though, I don't see anything wrong with using one huge partition > for your OS unless you have specific reasons to do otherwise. Most > virtual machine managers will let you use a large file on the host OS > partition to emulate a drive for a client OS, at some not-huge cost in > performance.
I would use LVM to make the partitions rather then waste systems resources going through an extra filesystem. Its no more difficult. i.e.
Sorry mate, I have totally missed your point here. Which "extra filesystem"?
Regards, Keith
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- From: emiddleton@example.com
- References:
- [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- From: Micheal Cooper
- Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- From: emiddleton@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] TLUG BBQ
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] server installation best practices/ worksheet
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] server partitions, LVM, and Xen
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links