Re: [tlug] (OT) Reverse DNS resolution blues- ISP recommendations?

[Curt Sampson <cjs@??>]

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Brett Robson wrote:

> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Brett Robson wrote:
> >
> > > Curt Sampson wrote:
> > > > $ host 58.81.178.245
> > > > 245.178.81.58.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
> > > > 58x81x178x245.ap58.ftth.ucom.ne.jp.
> > > > $ host 125.100.126.202 202.126.100.125.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
> > > > 125x100x126x202.ap125.ftth.ucom.ne.jp
> > >
> > > That's pretty well guaranteed to be rejected by many mail servers, quite 
> > > likely when you connect.
> ...
> It's not opinion it's fact. Read the OP again.

You'll have to explain yourself in a different way so I can understand.
I took your statement, "That's pretty well guaranteed to be rejected
by many mail servers, quite likely when you connect" to mean that my
connection or my mail would be rejected, yet I've successfully delivered
thousands of mail messages though those servers, and not had a single
bounce due to the remote end not liking my in-addr.arpa records.

So if you didn't mean my mail connection or message would be rejected,
what would be rejected?

cjs
--
Curt Sampson       <cjs@??>        +81 90 7737 2974