Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:17:51 +0900
- From: Alain Hoang <hoanga@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- References: <41AAF561-B373-423E-A64B-17CCFCC4A8D5@example.com> <877iva8i8x.fsf@example.com> <ba683e620701270238n1782af0bm6a1b3de7ec2fa84e@example.com> <87r6tg7ad8.fsf@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070120)
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > (3) Both of my Macs qualify by your standards for "new(er) computer", [snip] As Niels has said in his reply and my personal experiences with OOo on Mac OS X can attest. OOo is close to unacceptable as a real solution for Office-type software on OS X. The UI is extremely slow and it forces the user to use X11 I think OOo will be acceptable on OSX when it can claim that it works natively with Quartz or becomes Cocoa-ized. While an application like Matlab can use X11 on Mac and get away with it (think of the average user of Matlab) I doubt OOo's potential user base would be that forgiving. I certainly am not. > > On an Ubuntu system running from a Live CD, it took over 40 minutes to [snip] I find this a really, really poor anti-example of using OOo on Linux. My few attempts at running many desktop-like applications from a Live CD have been as horrible. Access times an optical drive (even with today's faster speeds) is extremely slow compared to hard drives. While you might be able to benefit from caching effects after the _first load_ of the application (assuming sufficient RAM which in this case there isn't). While I can understand the desire to just pop in a Live CD to demo Linux in its full glory. Asking penguins to fly higher than eagles is asking a lot. :-) This is another reason why I've become wary of using Live CDs as a Linux technology demo in general since I can imagine many replays of situations like this... Evangelist: "Try this out" User: "Hey, what's this? A Microsoft Office clone." Evangelist: "No, don't.... oh well... how about some coffee on the other side of town?" > > So what can I run OOo on to get acceptable performance? How about forsaking one a new upcoming hot boxen (assuming this comes from lab funds) and acquiring a couple of lab laptops that resemble the student's du jour model? Hand them a laptop pre-installed with the latest distro X that has OOo already installed and tell them to play with that. If the laptop looks spec-wise similar their own they might be convinced it's not a bait and switch (What? That loaned laptop was a quad-core quad-CPU with more RAM than the whole student lab combined?!? ããããããï [1]) Alain [1] Okay, okay there might be underfunded and underpowered labs where beating all the RAM combined in that lab won't be that hard. Hopefully it's not yours ;-)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Linux on Japanese TV News
- From: mcooper
- [tlug] Linux on Japanese TV News
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Linux on Japanese TV News
- From: Roger Markus
- [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Linux on Japanese TV News
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Open mouth, insert foot, defend Office.org
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links