Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:53:55 +0100
- From: Botond Botyanszki <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- References: <45AAFDA9.90504@example.com> <20070115091710.465a8f0b.jep200404@example.com> <19dd68ba0701150650r61774eabu85901890f61e6fd2@example.com> <20070115170502.44e0e175.godwin.stewart@example.com> <20070115230136.63fa1a51@example.com> <20070115180538.7c223499.jep200404@example.com> <20070116001751.3faf2b91@example.com> <d8fcc0800701151711k74110759pa83f65589d745ced@example.com>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:11:04 +0900 "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com> wrote: > He probably meant #!/bin/sh, actually. I don't use any bash-isms in my > shell scripts specifically to avoid the situation you described, where > my scripts won't run on other Unices. Same here, in theory this is how you do it. But when it comes to reality, you will only realize that your script doesn't run on some unix flavor when you actually test it on that platform. If you can really do this "write once, run everywhere", I'll bow before you. ;) With perl this statement stands. Now lets talk about which editor is better, emacs or vi ;-)Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Dave M G
- Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Jim
- Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Guillaume Proux
- Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Jim
- Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language
- Next by Date: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Previous by thread: Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Next by thread: Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links