Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?

[Brett Robson <b-robson@example.com>]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> > > > > > "Brett" == Brett Robson <b-robson@example.com> writes:
> > > > > >            
>
>    >> He's telling you that your original statement (as quoted here)
>    >> was wrong:
>
>    Brett> [...] Using UTF for for Japanese email breaches RFCs, you
>    Brett> are supposed to use 2022-JP.
>
>    >> In contradiction to your unqualified statement above, it
>    >> *doesn't* breach RFCs.
>
>    Brett> The reason it is "unqualified" is because you have
>    Brett> dishonestly quoted me.
>
> I guess it's a more tail-twisting, but definitely not dishonest.  The
> quote is accurate and complete, until you explicitly disavow the word
> "breach".
>
> That was my entire complaint.  All you need to do is say "I'm sorry,
> that word is completely inappropriate, indefensible, and I retract
> it", and then I can apologize for being an arrogant pedant, and we can
> all be friends.
>
> How about it?
>
>
>  

I tell you what, when I want a lecture from you I'll sit in on one of 
your economics subjects.