Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:56:46 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- References: <4385B3F2.1030602@example.com> <878xvdbgop.fsf@example.com> <20051125162337.13E3.B-ROBSON@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.5-b23 (daikon, linux)
>>>>> "Brett" == Brett Robson <b-robson@example.com> writes: Brett> I certainly don't need a lecture from you what my job is. You didn't, and won't, get one. But whatever it is, please do it responsibly. Brett> My job is to help provide communication for Japan not 国際 Brett> 化. As for being part of the "problem", telling others to Brett> upgrade their MUA is an arrogance people outside academia Brett> can't afford. Oh, c'mon. The people who aren't going to change MUAs in order to conform to standards are the same folks who are forced to upgrade by their vendors all the time. Arrogance is no way limited to academics. And how about your industry? There are plenty of ISPs who will tell you they don't support Linux etc. (or there were a couple years ago), or that they don't support Windows 3.1/95/98 anymore, etc. Nor did I tell you to tell anybody to upgrade. What I told you is "don't claim that the RFCs support your pragmatic decision to do what's easy for your customers". Brett> Advancing the state of the art is the job of academics and Brett> industry bodies; Sure, but that's just academic until the users adopt it. You may not be able to usefully encourage your users to improve their MUAs, but that's no reason to discourage TLUGgers from using UTF-8 with disinformation. As I admitted, the fact that most of the vendors in Japan are not interested in becoming standards-compatible is useful to people who want to set their outgoing MIME charset and forget it. But there are plenty of people who _want_ to be part of the solution, and not a few who _need_ a solution to problems that RFC 1468 was not intended to address. Brett> BTW I have actually helped Lyle and several others here. Nothing wrong with that. You should do it more often.<wink> -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- From: Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- From: Brett Robson
- Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- From: Brett Robson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- Next by Date: [tlug] ADMIN: Water Hose (was: Japanese Encoding - which one?)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Japanese Encoding - which one?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links