Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:03:43 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- References: <41FC3A0D.5010806@example.com><877jlu7uf7.fsf@example.com><41FD5EE4.4060104@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (chestnut, linux)
>>>>> "Lyle" == Lyle Saxon <ronfaxon@example.com> writes: Lyle> Automation is not (always) the root of all evil! Who's objecting to automation? Not me! I objected to WYSIWYG that (in my experience, anyway) gets in the way of all automation that is higher-order than the WYSIWYG application itself. Lyle> I agree that doing it all by hand is best - *if* you have Lyle> the time. It's not a question of doing more by hand than you have to. The issue here is do you trust your tools? WYSIWYG is basically the Pointy Haired Boss approach to automation: digitized manual labor that requires no thought or training in the simple case (same as reStructuredText, see example below), while inhibiting acquisition of any skill outside the job description (opposite of reStructuredText, which produces straightforward HTML and LaTeX that is all of structured, editable by humans, and parsable by 3rd-party applications). Here's what it is supposed to look like, make it look like that on-screen, bear no responsibility if the app screws up. I demand automation, but I don't need WYSIWYG because I trust my tools to do exactly what I want based on what I tell them to do 95% of the time, and 95% of the remainder it's not worth fixing. In fact, often enough I discover that "you can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime, you get what you need". Lyle> (Yes, there are glitches, but under some circumstances, it Lyle> saves time.) I've never actually seen WYSIWYG save time in a situation where automation is appropriate. Of course it saves time if you're producing a one-of-a-kind object (aka work of art), but that is the opposite of automation. In a context that requires automation, it is possible to work around the defects of WYSIWYG, as "modern" browsers that automatically open all viruses^Wforeign format files with appropriate infection vectors^W^Wapplications prove---but as the "inoperative" words demonstrate, that has its costs, too. It's true that because WYSIWYG applications have become ubiquitous, using their UIs saves time for brainwashed users. That's acceptable in the short run, but surely worth our while in both human and economic terms to change in the long run. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- References:
- [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- From: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIEZhcmthcw==?=
- Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- From: Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- Next by Date: [tlug] [OT] Local support company
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] furigana...openoffice?
- Next by thread: [tlug] [OT] Local support company
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links