Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 22:52:34 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- References: <200409022259.56931.rondonko@example.com><20040902141815.GA10856@example.com><20040902174117.GC7146%jmglov@example.com><871xhk89bb.fsf@example.com><1094176743.3640.31.camel@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, linux)
>>>>> "Shawn" == Shawn <javajunkie@example.com> writes: Shawn> What about razor (working in conjunction with spamassassin) -- Razor can help, but as far as I can tell it's open to abuse by a determined saboteur. Anything automatic is. And there are cruder DoS attacks, ie, on the Razor servers themselves, and/or on the DNS. I don't think the spammers will allow Razor to survive if it seems to be a real threat, ie, if a lot of sites are using it. Also, it's "signature-based", and at least some of those signatures are sensitive to random information like quoting. So it must be somewhat stupid about computing signature hashes. The only way to beat that is to go "AI", and assess spamminess and/or topicality of content. Which is what I said in the first place. And, of course, if it gets really successful, they may very well decide to charge for access. Or if a couple of big list servers cause congestion on the Razor server, they may just blacklist them. Isn't that just spatial? See http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/doc.php?type=text&name=SERVICE_POLICY In the short run, yes. Razor is going to work pretty well, especially in combination with other methods, eg, SpamAssassin. But I'd want a good local backup in Razor decides to go away for any reason. Shawn> Too much of a risk -- need to open 2703 (Razor2) and TCP Shawn> port 7 (Echo)? Too slow? There are practical considerations, too. By far not everybody has a choice about firewall policy. Also, some people I trust to know what they're doing guesstimate that all network-based checks are expensive in bandwidth. XEmacs's host doesn't use either RBL or Razor, to conserve on bandwidth. They've never actually tried either in the production mail pipeline, though, so it _is_ just a guess. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Brett Robson
- References:
- [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Wayne
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Jim Tittsler
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Shawn
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] [tlug-digest] Thanks Steve for emacs and utf-8 explanation
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links