Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:50:32 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- References: <200409022259.56931.rondonko@example.com><20040902141815.GA10856@example.com><20040902174117.GC7146%jmglov@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, linux)
>>>>> "Josh" == Josh Glover <tlug@example.com> writes: Josh> It generates between 200-500 spams a day, about %15 of which Josh> are currently beating my SpamAssassin setup. SpamAssassin currently sucks, mostly because they have spent more time on writing new improved versions of the code than they have on updating recipes. Cf. http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html. <a href="http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/Tools/Attitude/procmailrc"> This</a> makes a big improvement. I'd say only 1-2% get past that (which includes a SpamAssassin run), and less than 1 in 1000 false positives (of course about half go to /dev/null, but I doubt that increases the average rate). The procmailrc on xemacs.org is even better, but I haven't had time to synch to that in about a month. Basically, if I was willing to trust to probability, I could get away with an hour a week on spam-fighting, which ain't bad for a listmaster whose open-post lists are Google-able and whose addresses are published on the home page. As it is, it's about an hour a day because my co-postmasters are on vacation. Sure, I'd rather be coding, but we have somewhere between 1000 (the largest list) and 2500 (sum of subscriptions) subscribers, so every spam I stop saves a man-hour. Josh> Spam is a fact of life on today's Internet. Those of us who Josh> use email heavily have to invest time on our filtering Josh> setup. It actually wouldn't be that hard if I knew how to use Windows. I'd teach my mother to sign her mail with PGP, and once I had that in place, anybody who doesn't sign their mail goes to the bit-bucket. ;-) Really, that is the solution. There is no other, short of AI that is as good as a human at detecting spam; all digital IDs are trivial to forge, you must have cryptographic authentication. Josh> I am sorry that TLUG lacks the stealth technology necessary Josh> to avoid the spammers. You're starting to sound like Godwin: "cluck, cluck, cluck". (Next he'll be laying eggs, I bet.) We have the cycles, we should meet them head-on. Do we not all have MTAs? Require TLS and PGP signatures to post. Among other things, that will shut me up for a few days. ;-) And for another, I could spoof addresses for the amusement of the humans while getting past the 'bot once I prove I'm a dog. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Shawn
- References:
- [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Wayne
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Jim Tittsler
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links