Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what itclaims?
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:03:51 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what itclaims?
- References: <MBBBKFNBGKOCHLHLBFPOEEAICKAA.jc@example.com><004e01c3e9f5$7a614440$3000a8c0@example.com><opr2ruecad0fabl5@example.com> <401F75CE.1010700@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)
>>>>> "Fredric" == Fredric Fredricson <fredric@example.com> writes: Fredric> Personally I do not doubt that SCO got it all wrong but I think the odds that the Linux kernel repository contains SCO property are extremely high. A person's whose hearsay I trust (as far as I can imagine trusting hearsay) says he knows someone who has seen code which is licensed from SCO in Linux. I don't think it will help SCO much against IBM, because the code is a device driver for a specific piece of now-obsolete hardware, not IBM's. I expect that similar things can be found scattered throughout GNU/Linux, and the BSDs for that matter. I really don't think that we have to worry, though (unless you own stock in an existing company that distributes Linux). We all know that the vast majority of code in GNU/Linux and the *BSDs was written by the nominal contributor as documented in CVS and ChangeLogs. So we just do what the Berkeley people did to settle the USL suit: write clean-room reimplementations for the few "dirty" modules. Then _new commercial distros have no obligation whatsoever_ to SCO (or whoever). Any damages (for past lost sales/license fees of SCO) that are assessed in a victory against IBM or Red Hat will simply be transfers from one set of money-mongers to another. Might bankrupt some of the commercial Linux distributors, and I feel sorry for them. In the medium term, a few companies that would otherwise substitute Linux for Solaris or AIX will chicken out. This effect could even (perversely) generate more revenue for the "big" Linux vendors, who would have some credibility (unlike the FSF, which can't afford to do more than require its contributors to legally assume all copyright risks of code they contribute) if they warrant their code base to be "pure". But long run impact? None, I believe. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- From: Alessandro Mantelli
- Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- RE: [tlug] shell scripts
- From: James Cluff
- [tlug] shell scripts SCO?
- From: Alessandro Mantelli
- [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- From: Shawn
- Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- From: Fredric Fredricson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Virus scanners
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links