Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 22:23:53 +0900
- From: Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- References: <20020903012221.GD28108@example.com> <E17mCoD-0003UN-00@example.com> <1031058944.3713.33.camel@example.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 September 2002 22:15, bruno raoult wrote: > Cannot be sure, but with my EVO 1.0.7, I got no trash in any pgp > signature since the beginning of this thread. If you could send > me 2 mails (with both "standards") at br@example.com, to > confirm, this could be an answer to your question... > > br. Ok, here's the old ASCII armoured PGP non-MIME plain text variant that my KMail does by default (no patches applied). If somebody with a vanilla PGP/MIME signature could do likewise? Cheers Ulrich Plate - -- GPG ID CF7D6206 (CDD6 3225 3489 1305 D4D6 1CCF 50E8 6505 CF7D 6206) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys CF7D6206 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9dLf1UOhlBc99YgYRAgOFAKDC/ha7FS1qEaADGIrYs5QEC37kGQCg10Ox OyNfsD6wq2gqdkAQUKACeKk= =Coi4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: bruno raoult
- References:
- [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Ulrich Plate
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: bruno raoult
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links