Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg

[Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 September 2002 21:02, Josh Glover wrote:
> Quoth Godwin Stewart (Tue 2002-09-03 11:39:59AM +0200):
> > Therefore, I'm going to advocate standards compliancy once
> > again and vote that we do PGP/MIME.
>
> May I have your children? ;)
>
> Seriously, your argument is dead-on the way I see it. The only way to force
> standards compliance is if we refuse to accept solutions that do not
> comply.

Cool. Now if all those who can afford to be righteous bastards could please 
briefly point out to the more malleable sheep down here which mail client or 
plugin to a mail client is capable of interpreting both standards correctly, 
I'd be much obliged. Don't tell me there is none for Linux, apparently 
there's even one for OS X (GPGMail, http://sente.epfl.ch/software/GPGMail/). 

Ulrich Plate
PS: Oh, and additional S/MIME compliance would really make my day. :-) 
- --> "You shouldn't have said that, you idiot! init 1 *now*, quick!!!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9dKp1UOhlBc99YgYRAv9dAJ9W3aFBcahOwPIvCMHXgm1yxOD5XgCg0DMx
kcIvR2RiDeuNfjZLr9HABt0=
=y+If
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----