Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:37:15 +0900
- From: Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- References: <20020903012221.GD28108@example.com> <20020903053854.GC5943@example.com> <20020903142533.4085d3b9.simon@example.com>
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 14:25, simon colston wrote: > Sylpheed recognises and checks the signature of Jonathon's, Josh's, > Godwin's, etc mail but no longer checks yours since you applied the patch. > It would seem that Sylpheed is not Microsoft compliant :-) KMail recognises the signature *only* for mails Scott sends from the patched Mutt. Hawld on while my public key is being generated (phhhht, not enough entropy, whaddaya mean? 260 more bytes needed, wiggle your mouse?) Cheers Ulrich Plate
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Ulrich Plate
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: simon colston
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links