Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg

[Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:25:33PM +0900, simon colston wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 00:38:54 -0500
> Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com> wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> 
> I am using Sylpheed 0.8.2.  Scott, since you applied the OE patch Sylpheed no longer recognises your mail as being digitally signed but puts crap like the above in the body.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Since the problem is really OE's, I ain't patching :-)
> > 
> > And, sad to say, not just OE--see above.  1.5 is in beta, so it
> > shouldn't be an issue for mutt users too much longer.  
> 
> Sylpheed recognises and checks the signature of Jonathon's, Josh's, Godwin's, etc  mail but no longer checks yours since you applied the patch.  It would seem that Sylpheed is not Microsoft compliant :-)

Now, that is TOO funny.  What about the mutt users--Jonathan?  And other
*nix client users?

I think if that turns out to be the case (where none of the *nix clients
recognize it, it'll be time to replace it with an unpatched.  Although
of course, that then begs the question, what will happe with mutt 1.5?

Also, Simon, quick question (I probably won't see the answer till
tomorrow, when I'll be answering with an unpatched mutt)
What version of Sylpheed?

Thanks.


- -- 
Scott

PGP keyID EB3467D6 (1B48 077d 66F6 9DB0 FDC2  A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9dFeF+lTVdes0Z9YRAtcfAJ9jNXL2R0s6/IMUbFDQQ383oJzMIQCdEhlB
VDEIgezcIhNYBMz/fTVHK/4=
=a/YB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----